三星助力苹果革新iPhone内存封装：独立封装时代来临？

英文：iPhone 17 Series: Horizontal "Race Track" Camera, Ultra-Thin Body, and 120Hz High-Refresh Rate Screens Lead a New Wave in Smartphone Design

三星助力苹果革新iPhone内存封装：独立封装时代来临？近年来，人工智能（AI）技术在移动设备上的应用日益广泛，对手机硬件，特别是内存提出了更高的要求。这其中，内存带宽成为制约AI性能提升的关键瓶颈

三星助力苹果革新iPhone内存封装：独立封装时代来临？

近年来，人工智能（AI）技术在移动设备上的应用日益广泛，对手机硬件，特别是内存提出了更高的要求。这其中，内存带宽成为制约AI性能提升的关键瓶颈。传统PoP（Package on Package）封装方式，由于其物理结构限制，已难以满足AI大模型对高速数据传输的需求。为此，苹果公司计划从2026年起，在其iPhone产品中采用全新的内存独立封装方案，并寻求三星的合作，以期显著提升iPhone的AI性能。这一举动引发了业界广泛关注，同时也提出了更多疑问。

苹果的战略转变：从PoP封装到独立封装

目前主流智能手机普遍采用PoP封装技术，将内存芯片直接堆叠在SoC（系统级芯片）之上，通过引脚实现数据传输。这种设计在过去曾有效地解决了手机内部空间有限的问题，并提供了SoC和内存之间短距离的高速互连。然而，随着AI技术的快速发展，特别是大模型的本地推理需求日益增长，PoP封装的劣势逐渐显现。

PoP封装的主要问题在于带宽瓶颈和散热问题。尽管近年来GBA焊点间距不断缩小，引脚数量也不断增加，但SoC和内存之间的数据传输仍然受到物理设计的限制，难以实现大幅提升。在AI大规模计算对带宽需求越来越高的背景下，PoP封装的互连密度已成为瓶颈。此外，PoP封装将内存直接堆叠在SoC之上，导致热量集中在芯片顶部，散热效率低下，尤其在高负载AI任务下，容易造成芯片过热，影响性能和稳定性。

为了解决这些问题，苹果公司计划从2026年开始，在其iPhone产品中采用内存独立封装方案。这标志着苹果公司在内存封装技术上的重大战略转变。这意味着，苹果将放弃在SoC上直接堆叠内存的PoP封装方式，转而将LPDDR内存独立封装，以提升带宽和散热效率，从而显著提升iPhone的AI性能。这与苹果在Mac电脑上采用的M系列芯片的统一内存架构（UMA）形成鲜明对比。

统一内存架构（UMA）与独立封装：两种不同路径的抉择

苹果在Mac电脑上采用UMA，将内存直接集成到SoC中，实现了CPU、GPU和NPU等不同计算单元对内存的共享访问，有效降低了延迟，提升了效率。UMA在高性能计算任务中表现出色，尤其在图形处理、大型应用和AI训练等方面优势明显。然而，UMA方案在手机上的应用却面临诸多挑战。

首先是功耗和散热问题。将内存集成到SoC中会显著增加整体功耗和热量，这对于电池容量有限的智能手机来说是一个巨大的挑战。频繁的AI任务调用内存会迅速消耗电量，影响手机续航时间。其次是空间限制。在SoC中集成内存会增加芯片的尺寸和厚度，限制手机设计灵活性。此外，UMA方案的封装工艺复杂且成本高昂，最终会体现在产品定价上。

相比之下，内存独立封装方案更符合智能手机的实际需求。它允许采用更新的内存技术，例如LPDDR6，并通过宽总线设计实现更高的带宽，从而有效解决PoP封装的带宽瓶颈。同时，独立封装也更容易优化散热，提高设计的灵活性。

然而，独立封装也并非完美无缺。它依然需要解决机身空间占用和信号延迟等问题。但是，在当前技术条件下，它无疑是一种更加实际、可行的方案，可以更好地平衡性能、功耗、成本和设计灵活性。

安卓阵营的应对：追随还是另辟蹊径？

苹果的内存独立封装方案为整个智能手机行业带来了新的思考。与iPhone一样，安卓手机也面临着AI时代内存带宽瓶颈的问题。除非大模型的运行机制发生重大变化，否则手机仍然需要依赖芯片与内存之间的大规模数据传输。

安卓阵营可能面临两种选择：一是跟随苹果的脚步，采用内存独立封装方案；二是继续在PoP封装基础上，通过改进信号互连技术或优化工艺来缓解带宽不足的问题。最终的选择将取决于安卓手机厂商和高通、联发科等芯片厂商的共同努力，需要找到更适合安卓阵营的解决方案。

AI手机的未来：内存技术变革的序幕

苹果计划于2026年在其iPhone 18系列产品中首发采用内存独立封装技术，这标志着智能手机内存技术变革的序幕正式拉开。这一举动将对整个智能手机行业产生深远的影响，未来几年，我们可能会看到更多关于内存封装技术的创新和改进。

从软件到硬件，从芯片设计到ID设计，AI手机的浪潮正在改变着一切。内存封装技术的变革只是其中一个方面，未来我们将看到更多令人兴奋的创新成果，进一步提升手机的AI性能和用户体验。 这将是一个持续演进的过程，各个厂商之间的竞争和合作将共同推动智能手机技术的发展，最终受益的将是消费者。 苹果的这一举动，无疑将加速这一进程，并引领行业进入一个新的时代。 新的挑战和机遇并存，让我们拭目以待，看看在未来的智能手机市场上，谁将最终胜出。 而这个改变，或许也并非仅仅是内存封装方式的改变，而是对整个移动计算架构的一次深刻的反思和革新。

The year 2024 witnessed a surge in AI integration across various smartphone models, from iPhones to Pixels, and from Honor to OPPO devices. This widespread adoption significantly increased AI's presence in daily user experiences, encompassing AI-powered voice assistants, image editing tools, and content summarization features. Almost without exception, major manufacturers are heavily investing in AI, which is rapidly altering the demands placed on core smartphone hardware. Specifically, AI, particularly its foundation in large language models, imposes unprecedented demands on smartphone memory – not just in capacity, but critically in bandwidth. Local inference using large models requires memory that can read, write, and exchange data at exceptionally high speeds. Theoretically, higher memory bandwidth equates to faster AI task response times; conversely, insufficient bandwidth creates processing bottlenecks. This increased demand has exposed limitations in the prevalent Package on Package (PoP) memory stacking technology used in current smartphones.

The PoP methodology, which stacks memory directly onto the SoC, provided a clever space-saving solution in the past. However, the ever increasing demands of AI are pushing this technology to its limits. The limited interconnect density of PoP packaging restricts the achievable bandwidth increase, hindering the performance of AI tasks. Moreover, the close proximity of memory to the SoC leads to heat buildup, further impacting performance and stability. The limitations of bandwidth and heat dissipation caused by PoP packaging are becoming increasingly problematic.

This situation has forced a reevaluation of memory packaging strategies. Two main options emerge: integrating memory directly into the SoC, mirroring the unified memory architecture (UMA) of Apple's M-series chips, or employing independent memory packaging. Apple's decision to move towards independent memory packaging for its A-series chips, despite its utilization of UMA in its M-series chips, highlights a crucial difference in hardware needs between desktop and mobile devices.

UMA excels at integration and resource sharing. By embedding memory directly within the SoC, UMA allows CPU, GPU, and NPU units to access the same memory pool, minimizing data duplication and latency. This strategy has demonstrated remarkable success in Mac and iPad Pro devices, especially for graphics processing, large applications, and AI training where high bandwidth and low latency are crucial.

However, utilizing UMA in smartphones presents significant challenges. The integration of memory into the SoC increases power consumption and heat generation, significantly affecting battery life and requiring more robust thermal management solutions. The limited internal space in smartphones further compounds this issue; adding a memory unit increases the overall size and complexity of the SoC. The enhanced manufacturing complexity and costs associated with UMA also impact the final product price.

The independent LPDDR memory packaging method provides a more practical solution for smartphones. This approach allows for the use of newer, faster memory technologies and provides higher bandwidths through wider bus designs, which compensates for the interconnect density issues of PoP. Independent packaging also offers better thermal management and design flexibility. While independent packaging does present challenges like increased device size and signal latency, these are less problematic than the limitations of PoP packaging and the complexities of adopting UMA in mobile devices. Currently, the independent packaging methodology appears to be a more practical and achievable route.

Apple's projected shift to independent memory packaging in its 2026 iPhone 18 lineup, featuring the A20 chip, highlights the potential for this technology to overcome bandwidth limitations in high-performance mobile devices. This move raises the question of how Android smartphone manufacturers will respond to this challenge. They face a similar need to adapt, as the inherent bandwidth limitations of PoP packaging persist regardless of the operating system. Android manufacturers could follow Apple's lead and adopt independent memory packaging, or they could explore alternatives such as improving signal interconnect technology within the PoP design to address the ongoing bandwidth and heat dissipation issues. The optimal solution will depend